06.09.2019»»пятница

nowbotdefense

Stan Walters The Truth About Lying Pdf Viewer

06.09.2019
    14 - Comments
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Truth about Lying: How to Spot a Lie and Protect Yourself from Deception” as Want to Read:

Business and Personal Training seminar featuring Stan Walters outlining. THE TRUTH ABOUT LYING. The Truth About Lying by Stan Walters, 112, available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. Share; US$19.93 US$23.00. The Truth About Lying. Read the PDF on your Sony Reader, Nook, Kobo, iPhone. About the Author Stan B Walters.

Rate this book
1 of 5 stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
Open Preview

See a Problem?

We’d love your help. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of The Truth about Lying by Stan B. Walters.
Not the book you’re looking for?

Preview — The Truth about Lying by Stan B. Walters

Communication skills can make a big difference in whether people tell you the truth or not. Knowing when to ask the next question, the behaviors that signal when the whole story isn't being told and what questions to ask can help you cut through deception and lying so you can have confidence in your communications.
Based on the same methods used by law enforcement professio...more
Or buy for
Published May 1st 2000 by Sourcebooks (first published March 29th 2000)
More Details...
The Truth About Lying: How to Spot a Lie and Protect Yourself from Deception
1570715114 (ISBN13: 9781570715112)
English
All EditionsAdd a New EditionCombine
...Less Detailedit details
To see what your friends thought of this book,please sign up.
To ask other readers questions aboutThe Truth about Lying,please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Truth about Lying

Stan Walters The Truth About Lying Pdf Viewer
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.Add this book to your favorite list »
Rating details

Jun 13, 2015Tucker rated it really liked it
The author says that being shifty-eyed and stammering doesn't, contrary to common belief, always mean that someone is lying. When people are lying, they tend to change their usual mannerisms with their face, hands, and voice, but you have to get a baseline to know what is usual for that particular person.
He brings in Elisabeth Kübler-Ross's schema for the stages of grief – acceptance, bargaining, anger, depression, and denial – and says that it really applies more broadly to how people deal with...more
Really great info in here, but I feel like half of the book was just repeating things that were already mentioned plenty of times before.
Sep 17, 2015Abdulla Mohammed Zain rated it really liked it
العلاقات:
يمكننا أن نصنف علاقاتنا بالناس الذين نتعامل معهم في حياتنا اليومية تحت أربعة أنواع رئيسية وهي: العلاقات الحميمة، والعلاقات الشخصية، والعلاقات الاجتماعية، والعلاقات العامة. وكل مجموعة من هذه المجموعات تمثل لنا معنى مختلف وتتنوع نوعية العلاقات التي نقيمها بتنوع هذه المجموعات، وربما تبادل مواقع من نعرفهم من الناس وتغير بين هذه المجموعات.
***
مجموعة العلاقات العامة: وتشمل المجموعة الأخيرة باقي الناس، والتي سوف نطلق عليها المجموعة ' العامة '.
وهذه المجموعة تشمل السياسيين، أو الزعماء العالميين،...more
Eh, not that great. I took some courses on criminal interviewing in college but my days of touring the Ivy League circuit giving lectures on the topic are behind me. With that said, I wasn't that impressed with this one. Tells a lot of basic common sense responses that most people don't pay much attention to but there's nothing enlightening that will make you an expert human lie detector after reading this book. It tells of various techniques to use then spends the rest of the time explaining th...more
_يعاني المخادعون خلل في الكلام اكثر مما يعانيه الصادقون
_ان كسر التواصل البصري الذي يحدث في الوقت المناسب يبدو أنه تغير في السلوك الثابت للفرد ويبدو أيضا على أنه جزء من مجموعة علامات تشير الى ضغوط واحتمالية الكذب
_لا يصاحب حدوث الكذب الا عددا محدودا من سلوكيات اليد والذراع
_كلما ازداد مستوى الضغوط لدى أحدهم , ازدادت يداه نشاطا اثناء لعبهما بشيء ما
_لا تركز على جانب واحد فقط من الجسم كالرجلين مثلا حتى تحدد بدقة احتمالية وجود الخداع,بل راقب كل حركات الجسم
_اذا كانت حركةجسم محدثك أو ميله باتجاهك,فليس هذ...more
Readable and easy to use book on the observation in changes in behavior and other patterns of communication that indicate stress, and possibly lying. It should be taken with more than a few grains of salt-many of the behaviors that people display are either eccentricities (unique to the individual) or culturally derived (in a multi-cultural world, as we live now, some behaviors may mean something different in one culture to another). Nonetheless, as Ekman discusses in EMOTIONS REVEALED, some beh...more
Nov 21, 2008JP Morgan rated it liked it
Good intro to lie detection. Most of the verbal/non-verbal behavior I've seen in other texts, but it was good to see how they associate them with deception. Guidelines were helpful..look for clusters and timing. Desired Response chapter was something new...idea of getting people towards a state of acceptance was helpful and new, as well as the other preceeding states; anger, depression, bargaining and denial.
Mar 21, 2012Jessica rated it liked it
Very basic and I don't see why some of the topics, such as anger and depression, were covered rather than focusing on something more closely related to the intent of the book. They talked very little about how to spot a lie and protecting yourself from deceit...
Otherwise, very easy to read and understand. Would recommend it only to those who haven't read a lot, if anything, on deception.
Good to know, or perhaps most of the points are already known to many, but hard to apply it. The display of the symptom is not obvious, and it varies between people to people, and some people such as sales are simply too good at it.
Oct 26, 2009Alcqueline rated it liked it
This is a good book. I recommend it to anyone who is interested in learning about non-verbal communication. It does take a good while to actually become skilled at using the author’s techniques. However, it is relevant to my profession and works for me.
May 04, 2012Clifton Coetzee rated it really liked it
A great read for those interested in Kinesics and the skill of Detecting Deception.
I have incorporated many of Stan Walters techniques into my 'Truth Extraction' seminars
and workshops, in conjunction with Statement Analysis and MFE analysis.

Stan Walters The Truth About Lying Pdf Viewers

Great read and very useful. Good to leave lying around the place when your liar of a boyfriend comes around. Ha.
Decent overview of physical and behavioral signs that may indicate someone is being less than truthful.
Really enjoyed this book and will go back and reread there is a lot to take in and over a period of time I can tell the results from this book will be good.
Daniel Beckius rated it really liked it
Dec 28, 2017
About
Osama Elbosili rated it really liked it
May 24, 2018
Artur Hernandez rated it really liked it
Oct 31, 2014
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.Be the first to start one »
Recommend ItStatsRecent Status Updates

The Truth About Lying

See similar books…
See top shelves…
8followers

ACCURACY OF JUDGMENTS OF DECEPTION WHEN AN INTERVIEW IS WATCHED, HEARD, AND READ1

1

This investigation was supported by a USPHS research grant (MH 02704) to N. R. F. Maier from the National Institute of Mental Health, United States Public Health Service.

The Truth About Lying Book

Citing Literature

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 64

  • Glynis Bogaard and Ewout H. Meijer, Self‐Reported Beliefs About Verbal Cues Correlate with Deception‐Detection Performance, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 1, (129-137), (2017).
  • Karl Laird, Confronting Religion: Veiled Witnesses, the Right to a Fair Trial and the Supreme Court of Canada's Judgment in v .., The Modern Law Review, 77, 1, (123-138), (2014).
  • Donald Nicolson, Truth and Demeanour: Lifting the Veil, Edinburgh Law Review, 18, 2, (254), (2014).
  • Kent Marett and Joey F. George, Barriers to Deceiving Other Group Members in Virtual Settings, Group Decision and Negotiation, 22, 1, (89), (2013).
  • Marc-André Reinhard, Siegfried L. Sporer and Martin Scharmach, Perceived Familiarity with a Judgmental Situation Improves Lie Detection Ability, Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72, 1, (43), (2013).
  • Deborah Bradford, Jane Goodman-Delahunty and Kevin R. Brooks, The Impact of Presentation Modality on Perceptions of Truthful and Deceptive Confessions, Journal of Criminology, 2013, (1), (2013).
  • Robin S. Poston and Cheri Speier, Effort-Accuracy Trade-Off in Using Knowledge Management Systems, Organizational Learning and Knowledge, 10.4018/978-1-60960-783-8.ch721, (2798-2822), (2012).
  • Marc-Andre Reinhard, Martin Scharmach and Siegfried L. Sporer, Situational Familiarity, Efficacy Expectations, and the Process of Credibility Attribution, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10.1080/01973533.2012.655992, 34, 2, (107-127), (2012).
  • Lina Zhou and Dongsong Zhang, Typing or messaging? Modality effect on deception detection in computer-mediated communication, Decision Support Systems, 44, 1, (188), (2007).
  • Lina Zhou and Dongsong Zhang, A Comparison of Deception Behavior in Dyad and Triadic Group Decision Making in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication, Small Group Research, 37, 2, (140), (2006).
  • Martha Davis, Keith A. Markus and Stan B. Walters, Judging the Credibility of Criminal Suspect Statements: Does Mode of Presentation Matter?, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10.1007/s10919-006-0016-0, 30, 4, (181-198), (2006).
    • 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Big Island, HI, USA 03-06 Jan. 2005 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences IEEE , (2005). 0-7695-2268-8 K. Marett and J.F. GeorgeGroup Deception in Computer-Supported Environments 19b 19b , 10.1109/HICSS.2005.290 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1385265/
  • Wendy P. Heath, Bruce D. Grannemann and Michelle A. Peacock, How the Defendant's Emotion Level Affects Mock Jurors' Decisions When Presentation Mode and Evidence Strength Are Varied, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 3, (624-664), (2006).
  • Lina Zhou, Judee K Burgoon, Dongsong Zhang and Jay F Nunamaker, Language dominance in interpersonal deception in computer-mediated communication, Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 3, (381), (2004).
  • Anthea Taylor, I'll Call You Back on My Mobile: a critique of the telephone interview with adolescent boys, Westminster Studies in Education, 25, 1, (19), (2002).
  • Marifran Mattson, Mike Allen, Daniel J. Ryan and Vernon Miller, Considering organizations as a unique interpersonal context for deception detection: A meta‐analytic review, Communication Research Reports, 17, 2, (148), (2000).
  • Andrea B. Hollingshead, Truth and lying in computer-mediated groups, Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 10.1016/S1534-0856(00)03009-7, (157-173)
  • Paul Dishman and Philip Nitse, Disinformation usage in corporate communications: CI'ers beware, Competitive Intelligence Review, 10, 4, (20-29), (2001).
  • Mark A. deTurck, Thomas H. Feeley and Lori A. Roman, Vocal and visual cue training in behavioral lie detection, Communication Research Reports, 14, 3, (249), (1997).
  • Thomas H. Feeley and Mark A. DeTurck, Case‐relevant vs. case‐irrelevant questioning in experimental lie detection, Communication Reports, 10, 1, (35), (1997).
  • Gerhard Kette and Vladimir J. Konečni, Communication Channels and Gender Differences in Decoding and Integration of Cues in Legal Decision-Making, Psychology, Law, and Criminal Justice, 10.1515/9783110879483.314, (1996).
  • Richard Wiseman, The megalab truth test, Nature, 10.1038/373391a0, 373, 6513, (391-391), (1995).
  • Judee K. Burgoon, David B. Buller, Amy S. Ebesu and Patricia Rockwell, Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection, Communication Monographs, 61, 4, (303), (1994).
  • Pamela J. Kalbfleisch, Deceit, distrust and the social milieu: Application of deception research in a troubled world, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 3, (308), (1992).
  • Mark A. deTurck, Training observers to detect spontaneous deception: Effects of gender, Communication Reports, 4, 2, (81), (1991).
  • Ray Bull, Can Training Enhance the Detection of Deception?, Credibility Assessment, 10.1007/978-94-015-7856-1_5, (83-99), (1989).
  • George M. Kasper and Andrew H. Morris, The Effect of Presentation Media on Recipient Performance in Text-based Information Systems, Journal of Management Information Systems, 4, 4, (25), (1988).
  • Mark A. deTurck and Gerald M. Goldhaber, Perjury and deceptive judgments: How the timing and modality of witness deception affects jurors' deceptive judgments, Communication Quarterly, 36, 4, (276), (1988).
  • Richard Rogers, Assessment of Malingering Within a Forensic Context, Law and Mental Health, 10.1016/B978-1-4831-9752-4.50032-3, (209-237), (1987).
  • D.R. RUTTER, Outcome, Communicating by Telephone, 10.1016/B978-0-08-031324-5.50008-9, (81-114), (1987).
  • Robert L. Heneman, Michael L. Moore and Kenneth N. Wexley, Performance-rating accuracy: A critical review, Journal of Business Research, 15, 5, (431), (1987).
  • Anne Graffam Walker, Context, transcripts and appellate readers, Justice Quarterly, 3, 4, (409), (1986).
  • Charles S. White, Role-Played Relationships between Assertiveness and Mock Interviewing Success, Psychological Reports, 59, 2, (563), (1986).
  • Phillip J. Resnick, The detection of malingered mental illness, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2, 1, (21-38), (2006).
  • Richard Rogers, Towards an empirical model of malingering and deception, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2, 1, (93-111), (2006).
  • GERALD R. MILLER, MARK A. DETURCK and PAMELA J. KALBFLEISCH, SELF‐MONITORING, REHEARSAL, AND DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATION, Human Communication Research, 10, 1, (97-117), (2006).
  • David R. Brandt, Gerald R. Miller and John E. Hocking, Familiarity and lie detection: A replication and extension, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 3, (276), (1982).
  • BELLA M. DePAULO, Success at Detecting Deception: Liability or Skill?, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 364, 1, (245-255), (2006).
  • Glenn E. Littlepage and Martin A. Pineault, Detection of Truthful and Deceptive Interpersonal Communications across Information Transmission Modes, The Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 1, (57), (1981).
  • Miron Zuckerman, Bella M. DePaulo and Robert Rosenthal, Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 14, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60369-X, (1-59), (1981).
  • Kittie W. Watson and J. Donald Ragsdale, Linquistic indices of truthful and deceptive responses to employment interview questions, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 9, 2, (59), (1981).
  • Gerald R. Miller, Joyce E. Bauchner, John E. Hocking, Norman E. Fontes, Edmund P. Kaminski and David R. Brandt, “... and Nothing but the Truth”, The Trial Process, 10.1007/978-1-4684-3767-6_4, (145-179), (1981).
  • DAVID R. BRANDT, GERALD R. MILLER and JOHN E. HOCKING, THE TRUTH‐DECEPTION ATTRIBUTION: EFFECTS OF FAMILIARITY ON THE ABILITY OF OBSERVERS TO DETECT DECEPTION, Human Communication Research, 6, 2, (99-110), (2006).
  • JOYCE ELLYN BAUCHNER, ELYSE A. KAPLAN and GERALD R. MILLER, DETECTING DECEPTION: THE RELATIONSHIP OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION TO JUDGMENTAL ACCURACY IN INITIAL ENCOUNTERS, Human Communication Research, 6, 3, (253-264), (2006).
  • Bella M. Paulo, Miron Zuckerman and Robert Rosenthal, Humans us Lie Detectors, Journal of Communication, 30, 2, (129-139), (2006).
  • John E. Hocking and Dale G. Leathers, Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective, Communication Monographs, 47, 2, (119), (1980).
  • David R. Brandt, Gerald R. Miller and John E. Hocking, Effects of self‐monitoring and familiarity on deception detection1, Communication Quarterly, 28, 3, (3), (1980).
  • JOHN E. HOCKING, EDMUND P. KAMINSKI, JOYCE BAUCHNER and GERALD R. MILLER, DETECTING DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATION FROM VERBAL, VISUAL, AND PARALINGUISTIC CUES1, Human Communication Research, 6, 1, (33-46), (2006).
  • MARK L.KNAPP and MARK E. COMADEN, TELLING IT LIKE IT ISN'T: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND RESEARCH ON DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATIONS, Human Communication Research, 5, 3, (270-285), (2006).
  • Miron Zuckerman, Richard S. DeFrank, Judith A. Hall, Deborah T. Larrance and Robert Rosenthal, Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 4, (378), (1979).
  • Paul J Lavrakas and Richard A Maier, Differences in human ability to judge veracity from the audio medium, Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 2, (139), (1979).
  • David P. Farrington, Experiments on Deviance with Special Reference to Dishonesty, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 12, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60263-4, (207-252), (1979).
  • William R. Todd‐Mancillas and Robert J. Kibler, A test of concurrent validity for linguistic indices of deception, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 43, 2, (108), (1979).
  • David Smith, Selection and the Decision Making Process, Management Decision, 16, 1, (23), (1978).
  • Glenn Littlepage and Tony Pineault, Verbal, Facial, and Paralinguistic Cues to the Detection of Truth and Lying, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 3, (461), (1978).
  • Joyce E. Bauchner, David R. Brandt and Gerald R. Miller, The Truth/Deception Attribution: Effects of Varying Levels of Information Availability, Annals of the International Communication Association, 1, 1, (229), (1977).
  • Robert Johansen, Social evaluations of teleconferencing, Telecommunications Policy, 1, 5, (395), (1977).
  • Richard A. Maier and Paul J. Lavrakas, Lying Behavior and Evaluation of Lies, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 2, (575), (1976).
  • MARK L. KNAPP, RODERICK P. HART and HARRY S. DENNIS, AN EXPLORATION OF DECEPTION AS A COMMUNICATION CONSTRUCT, Human Communication Research, 1, 1, (15-29), (2006).
  • Patricia Cain Smith, James Mitchel and James Rollo, Influence of Varying Sources of Information on Judgments of Interviews, Psychological Reports, 34, 3, (683), (1974).
  • Michael E. Gordon, The effect of the correctness of the behavior observed on the accuracy of ratings, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 4, (366), (1970).
  • Norman R. F. Maier and Gertrude G. Casselman, The Sat as a Measure of Problem-Solving Ability in Males and Females, Psychological Reports, 26, 3, (927), (1970).
  • ORMAN R. WRIGHT, SUMMARY OF RESEARCH ON THE SELECTION INTERVIEW SINCE 1964, Personnel Psychology, 22, 4, (391-413), (2006).
  • Glynis Bogaard, Ewout H. Meijer, Aldert Vrij and Harald Merckelbach, Strong, but Wrong: Lay People’s and Police Officers’ Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0156615, 11, 6, (e0156615), (2016).

March 1968

Pages 23-30

 nowbotdefense © 2019